Skip to Content UTAS Home | Contacts
University of Tasmania Home Page Student Services and Support

Inclusive Language

People with Disabilities


The portrayal of people with disabilities has been fraught with contradictions, because of non-disabled people's ambivalent attitudes towards disability. People with disabilities were often described as helpless people to be pitied and to be taken care of. In other cases, feelings of horror, disgust and fear influenced the language used to describe them. The taboo nature of disability has also led to the creation of many euphemisms to describe disability and people with disabilities.

Types of discriminatory language and non-discriminatory alternatives


Discriminatory language in relation to the portrayal of people with disabilities is characterised by depersonalising, by emphasising the disability rather than the person, and by stereotyping.

Depersonalising or impersonal reference

Often people with a disability are referred to collectively as the disabled, the mentally retarded, the blind, the deaf, or paraplegics or spastics or epileptics and so forth. These terms have the effect of depersonalising the description of people.

It is therefore recommended that the impersonal reference to people with disabilities be avoided.

The following terms are generally preferred to describe a person with a disability or people with disabilities, as they recognise that the disability is only one characteristic of the person or persons:

  • Person with a disability
  • Person with disabilities
  • Students/employees with disabilities.

If it is necessary or desirable to be more specific about the type of disability involved, the same strategy is recommended - that is, not to focus entirely on the person's disability in the description. Do not put the disability first and the person second. The following are some commonly used phrases and suggested alternatives.

Alternatives

The following terms are generally preferred to describe a person with a disability or people with disabilities, as they recognise that the disability or impairment is only one characteristic of the person or persons:

  • A person with a disability
  • People with disabilities
  • People with visual impairments
  • People with alternative needs etc.
  • People with epilepsy
  • Students/employees with disabilities

If it is desirable or necessary to be more specific about the type of impairment or disability involved, the same strategy is recommended - that is, never use the article 'the' with an adjective to describe people with disabilities.

The terms 'able-bodied', 'physically challenged', 'differently abled' and 'sufferer' are strongly discouraged.

Be careful not to imply that people with disabilities are to be pitied, feared or ignored, or that they are somehow more heroic, courageous, patient, or 'special' than others. Never use the term 'normal' in contrast.

A person having to use a wheelchair is a 'wheelchair user' or 'uses a wheelchair'. Avoid terms that define the disability as a limitation, such as 'confined to a wheelchair', or 'wheelchair-bound'. A wheelchair provides mobility and new opportunities rather than confines the user.

Never use the terms 'victim' or 'sufferer' to refer to a person who has or has had a disease or disability. This term dehumanises the person and emphasises powerlessness, e.g. use the term 'person with HIV' rather than an 'HIV sufferer'.

Back to Contents